There is a great arrogance presented in Turkey, which thinks that it could reverse the truths with a media/political party cooperation that had its roots in foreign countries. Forcibly, they expect us to believe that the truth is not what we can see, touch and experience every day, but rather the one they show us. They are not only expecting us to believe, that by enforcing the same force over us as an oppression tool with the most fascistic and corrupt tactics of a witch, they also expect us to say white is black, and, black is white.
In the 1952s, an operation, organized by the Gladio over NATO, quietly attempted a construction activity in the country. Their first victim was the Deceased Menderes. Since we were dealing with the “soldiers”, we were late to realize that the guardianship in Turkey was a civil structuring. We are even just realizing it lately. Maybe, if the 90s and globalization didn't catch up, if SSCB didn't disperse, if Gladios didn't lose their influence and wrap themselves in other costumes; this civil structuring was going to be hidden behind the military guardianship for a long while.
However, it's now understood that, since 1952, they had formatted the central media, chambers, NGOs, universities, judiciary and other bureaucracies of the country, directly or over the mentality rapport and funds, which are naturally carried out by Westernization. This format paved the way for Turkey to become a country controlled remotely. The contradiction, which pestered the country right at the beginning of our modernization story, in other words, the privileged/Western rulership equation against the nation, never actually ended.
Most likely, quite a successful production had been established to prevent Turkey from becoming independent with the rulership of the nation. Is there any other explanation for the left-wing, universities, media and businesses in this country to support the privileged and military's coups against the governments elected by the nation?
In the 90s, when the NATO Gladio became due, this time they started to organize the parallel structure that appeared civil or religious. We might have misunderstood the supporters of February 28th.While they were saying, “It will continue for a thousand years”; maybe they were referring to this civil-looking structure, rather than the military guardianship. While pulling Gülen to the U.S., it's possible that by handing Öcalan over to Turkey, in a style which Ecevit was quoted, “I don't understand why they handed him over to us”, in the same year they received PKK and its political party.
Now put your hand on your heart and think. Is there any other party in this country other than Erdoğan/Davutoğlu and AK Party that is local? All of them are fake and pretending; the media are also showing all their skills in order to deceive us that it's true. Are TUSIAD's statements before the elections normal? Is it normal for Demirtaş and Bahçeli to tear into TSK (Turkish Armed Forces) with the same statements after the Diyadin attacks? Is it normal for Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu to say, “We are not tearing into HDP, because we want them to be in the Parliament” for HDP, who is expected to receive more votes than CHP? Isn't the normal way to approach this Deniz Baykal's, who said “Are we the Red Crescent?”, as an attitude towards the HDP sympathy?
At this point, where the 150-year old dream is about to come true, is it normal for HDP to put in an appearance with all the structures, which turned into wreckages in order to resurrect the Old Turkey, and the ones, who were saying “The best Kurd is a dead Kurd”, at Doğan plazas? Is it normal for HDP, who had made a calling that caused 52 of our citizens to be slaughtered and who is taken under protection by the Doğan/Gülen-led group/foreign media, to be treated as flower children?
While PKK is busy with calling the provincial and district heads of AK Party and threatening them with killing their children, throwing stones at AK Party buses and implementing a 100% barrage in the East and Southeast, how should we react to HDP's enemy treatment towards AK Party, to whom they are indebted for being allowed to present a Presidential candidate in Turkey, rather than treating them as rivals? While the peace and New Turkey promises are providing HDP with the opportunity of asking votes from 80% of the community with enriched options, what's the meaning of taking sides with a handful of narrow minded mentality, which is dying to return back to Old Turkey?
Why would we want HDP to enter the Parliament? This is the HDP who made a calling that caused the deaths of people, who has the possibility to do it again after the elections, who didn't severe its relations with PKK and armed violence, who became a Kurdish CHP, who turned its back to the expectations of the voters and enter into the white Turks' service. Forget about the vote calculation. There is not a big difference between exceeding the threshold and fielding independent candidates. I just don't find HDP local and trustable. HDP is no longer the party of the base. HDP is within an anomaly to receive the votes of the base, which wants a 150-year-old dream to come true, and invest it in different accounts in Doğan plazas.
CHP and others, who are within the Old Turkey alliance, are performing the same anomaly. Because they are not local, they are not related with the community. They want us to shut our eyes to this weirdness and say that we think all these are ordinary and normal.
Excuse us. It will not happen. The old will stay old, and new will stay new.
